Early and Middle Adulthood Paper Essay

In this paper, I impart discus deuce theories that are relate to early and middle matureness. Also, I exit discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each of the theories. The two theories that I flummox selected are Eriksons familiarity versus isolation to explain the early maturity stage, and the Life Events Approach hypothesis.In the Eriksons psychosocial nurtureal system (intimacy versus isolation stage), conversance can be explained as is the major power to fuse ones identity with that of an other(a) whatsoeverbody without fear of loosing it (Feist, 2008, 258). It yet means an king and willingness to share a mutual trust. It involves sacrifice, compassion, shipment and so on.Isolation on the other hand, is the psychosocial counterpart of intimacy. It is defined as the imbecility to crap chances with ones identity by share true intimacy (Feist, 2008, 259). Erikson believed that there should be a fine ratio in the midst of the intimacy and isolation as excessively much isolation can further cause problems much(prenominal) as depression. hit the sack is the basic strength that is gained as a result from the crisis of intimacy versus isolation). According to Erikson, discern includes intimacy but it also contains some(prenominal) degree of isolation, because each partner is permitted to confine a separate identity (Feist, 2008).StrengthsHis theory gave a intent span growingal process.His theory explains each stage in detail including the time frame, and the changes involved.He turn to it is important to move by dint of the stages in order or it could causes crisis.Extended Freuds theory into different developmental stages such as adolescence, adulthood and old age.Claimed that ripening occurs across the life span.Places vehemence on social and historical influences on development in his theoryConflict between the opposing elements of each phase produces an self-importance strength or basic strength.impuissanceesHis theory is not bas ed on scientific evidence.His psychosocial developmental theory does not take into consideration different cultures of the world.The age groups with the developmental stages do not sound consistent.Generalizes that everyone goes through the same psychosocial developmental stages.The Life-Events ApproachIn the earlier version, some events such as a close of a spouse, divorce and marriage could be life changing and could influence an mortals development. In other words, such events could force the individual to change their temperament as they bring along atomic pile of stress.However, contemporary life-events approach emphasizes that individuals personality development does not only depend on the life events itself but also on mediating factors (physical health, family supports, for example), the individuals adaptation to the life event (appraisal of the threat, coping strategies, for example), the life-stage context, and the sociohistorical context (Santrock, 2008).Strengths sub servient addition to understanding adult development.Takes into placement life stressors and other mediating variables that could influence ones development.WeaknessThe life-events approach places too much emphasis on change.It does not adequately differentiate the stability characterizes adultdevelopment.It overlooks daily events that could be very stressful as well up for individuals.Therefore, in this paper, I have discussed two theories related to early and middle adulthood in detail. The two theories are Eriksons and the life events approach theory. Also, I have discussed the strengths and weaknesses of each theory.ReferencesFeist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2008) Theories of Personality (7th edition). New York McGraw-HillSantrock, J. W. (2008). Essentials of life-span development. NY McGraw-Hill.